e-cigs pulled from amazon?

Just out of curiosity I went to eBay, and it looks to me as if they don't sell the actual e.cigarettes but sell things like cases and maybe cartridges. Maybe these companies don't want to risk liability if it turns out the products are more hazardous than people think.

Some people believe that it is the https://www.kiwibox.com/milton8mil647/blog/entry/134569131/yeahwe-know-smoking-kills/ pharmaceutical companies (who make nicotine gum and patches) who are putting pressure on to get e.cigarettes banned.

I, personally, don't care one way or the other about e.cigarettes; but I don't think people's dislike of anyone else doing something that looks like smoking (but isn't), or else someone else's not liking the idea that people use nicotine (or Sweet 'n Low or beer or whatever else) ought to have any impact on the e.cigarette industry. I wrote a Hub after the FDA came out with preliminary findings on toxins, but the e.cigarette is a completely different product from tobacco cigarettes; and since second-had smoke isn't a factor (the water vapor disappears almost immediately, and it isn't smoke), I don't think it's up to anyone but users as to who takes any possible risks with them or doesn't. Whether or not the product has been approved as a stop-smoking device, that's what a lot of people are using it for. The same people who risk their own lives speeding in cars, who eat all kinds of unhealthy food, and who don't wash their hands after using a restroom are often the people who have it in their heads that anything that even looks like a cigarette is the "only evil" there is in the world. Common sense would tell people that a battery-operated cigarette that has "water smoke" should be the. choice of anyone who wants to use it, provided they have adequate information about any possible risks.



http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/22894